About Me

Name: Takeadair
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Conservatives vs Liberals

If a conservative doesn't like guns, he doesn`t buy one.
If a liberal doesn't like guns, he wants all guns outlawed.

If a conservative is a vegetarian, he doesn`t eat meat.
If a liberal is a vegetarian, he wants all meat products banned for everyone.

If a conservative sees a foreign threat, he thinks about how to defeat his enemy.
A liberal wonders how to surrender gracefully and still look good.

If a conservative is homosexual, he quietly leads his life.
If a liberal is homosexual, he demands legislated respect.

If a black man or Hispanic are conservative, they see themselves as independently successful.
Their liberal counterparts see themselves as victims in need of government protection.

If a conservative is down-and-out, he thinks about how to better his situation.
A liberal wonders who is going to take care of him.

If a conservative doesn't like a talk show host, he switches channels.
Liberals demand that those they don't like be shut down.

If a conservative is a non-believer, he doesn't go to church.
A liberal non-believer wants any mention of God and religion silenced.
(Unless it's a foreign religion, of course!)

If a conservative decides he needs health care, he goes about shopping for it, or may choose a job that provides it.
A liberal demands that the rest of us pay for his.

If a conservative slips and falls in a store, he gets up, laughs and is embarrassed.
If a liberal slips and falls, he grabs his neck, moans like he's in labor and then sues.

If a conservative reads this, he'll forward it so his friends can have a good laugh.
A liberal will delete it because he's "offended".
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Top Ten Indicators Your Employer Has Changed to ObamaCare

 

TOP TEN INDICATORS THAT YOUR EMPLOYER HAS CHANGED TOOBAMA'S HEALTH CARE PLAN:

(10) Your annual breast exam is done at Hooters.

(9) Directions to your doctor's office include "Take a left when you enter the trailer park."

(8) The tongue depressors taste faintly of Fudgesicles.

(7) The only proctologist in the plan is "Gus" from Roto-Rooter.

(6) The only item listed under Preventative Care Coverage is "an apple a day."

(5) Your primary care physician is wearing the pants you gave to Goodwill last month.

(4) "The patient is responsible for 200% of out-of-network charges," is not a typographical error.

(3) The only expense covered 100% is….  "Embalming."

(2) Your Prozac comes in different colors with little M's on them.

AND THE NUMBER ONE SIGN YOU'VE JOINED

OBAMA'S HEALTH CARE PLAN:

(1) You ask for Viagra, and they give you a Popsicle stick and duct tape

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Should Make this War Official

What's the war, it the war between
 
Liars, Looters, Moochers and Coercers
 
vs
 
The Producers
 
The problem that's surfacing is that there are more of  former then the latter are of us.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Time to Down Size Government to fit our economic climate

When a company falls on difficult times, one of the things that seems to happen
are they reduce their staff and workers. The remaining workers need to find ways
to continue to do a good job or risk that their job would be eliminated as well.
Wall street, and the media normally congratulate the CEO for making this type of
"tough decision", and his board of directors gives him a big bonus.

I feel our government should not be immune from similar risks. I therefore am
recommending the following cuts to be implemented by the next president elect.

Reduce the House of Representatives from the current 435 members to 218 members
and Senate members from 100 to 50 (one per State). Also reduce remaining staff
by 25%, Accomplish this over the next 8 years. (two steps / two elections) and
of course this would require some redistricting.

Some yearly monetary gains include:

$44,108,400 for elimination of base pay for congress. (267 members X $165,200
pay / member / yr.)

$97,175,000 for elimination of the above people's staff. (estimate $1.3 Mil in
staff per each member of the House, and $3 Mil in staff per each member of the
Senate every year)

$240,294 for the reduction in remaining staff by 25%.

$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork barrel ear-marks each year. (those members
who's jobs are gone. Current estimates for total government pork earmarks are at
$15 Billion / yr)

The remaining representatives would need to work smarter and would need to
improve efficiencies. It might even be in their best interests to work together
for the good of our country.

We may also expect that smaller committees might lead to a more efficient
resolution of issues as well. It might even be easier to keep track of what your
representative is doing.

Congress has more tools available to do their jobs than it had back in 1911 when
the current number of representatives was established. (Telephones, computers,
cell phones to name a few).

Note: Congress did not hesitate to jump on a train for home this week when it
was a holiday, when the nation needed a real fix to the economic problems. Also,
we have 3 senators that have not been doing their jobs for the past 18+ months
(on the campaign trail) and still they all have been accepting full pay. These
facts alone support a reduction in senators & congress.

Summary of opportunity:

$44,108,400 reduction of congress members.

$282,100,000 for elimination of the reduced house member staff.

$150,000,000 for elimination of reduced senate member staff.

$59,675,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining house members.

$37,500,000 for 25% reduction of staff for remaining senate members.

$7,500,000,000 reduction in pork added to bills by the reduction of congress
members.

$8,073,383,400 per year,estimated total savings.

Big business does these types of cuts all the time.

IF you are happy with how our government is right now, just ignor this message.

IF you are not happy, I assume you know what to do.
 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Forty Years of Democrat Theft of Your Social Security

 

If there is anyone out there that doesn't know this, this is the best visual presentation 
I ever saw....  Now, just remember who did this.......


Franklin Delano. Roosevelt
 
32nd. PresidentDemocrat 
Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945 

Our Social Security 
Franklin Delano Roosevelt (Terms of Office March 4, 1933, to April 12, 1945), aDemocratintroduced the Social Security (FICA) Program..  He Promised: 
        
1.)     That participation in the Program would be Completely voluntary, 
2.)     That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first   $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program, 
3.)     That the money the participants elected to put Into the Program would be deductible from Their income for tax purposes each year, 
4.)     That the money the participants put into the Independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the General operating fund, and therefore, would Only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and
5.)     That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income. 
Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxedon 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'Put Away' -- you may be interested in the following:


----------THEN---------------------------------------------------


Dwight David Eisenhower
 
34th. PresidentRepublican, 
Term Of Office: Jan uary 20, 1953 to Jan uary 20, 1961

Insert by Vincent Peter Render, 
  
If  I recall correctly1958 is the first year that Congress, not President Eisenhower, voted to remove some funds from Social Security and put it into the General Fund for Congress to spend. 
If  I recall correctly, it was a democratically controlled Congress. 
From what I understand, Congress logic at that time was that there was so much money in Social Security Fund that it would never run out / be used up for the purpose it was intended / set aside for.


-------------WORSE STILL------------------------------------------------


Lyndon Baines Johnson
 36th. President,Democrat 
Term Of Office: November 22, 1963 to Jan uary 20, 1969


Question:   Which Political Party took Social Security from the Independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the General Fund so that Congress could spend it? 
   
Answer:   It was Lyndon B. John son (Democrat,Term of Office:  November 22,1963 to Jan uary 20, 1969) and the democratically Controlled House and Senate.
        


-------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Question:   Which Political Party 
eliminated the income tax Deduction for Social Security 
(FICA) withholding? 
Answer:  
 The Democratic Party. 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------


William Jefferson Clinton 
(Bill Clinton) 
42nd. President 
Democrat Term of Office: Jan uary 20, 1993 to Jan uary 20, 2001


Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. 
(Al Gore) 
45th. Vice President


Democrat Term of Office: Jan uary 20, 1993 to Jan uary 20, 2001

Question:     Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities? 
Answer:     The Democratic Party, with Albert Arnold Gore, Jr. (Al Gore)  [Vice President Term of Office:   Jan uary 10, 1993 to Jan uary 20, 2001] casting the 'tie-breaking'  deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US ...


------------------THE STRAW THAT BROKE THE CAMEL'S BACK !!-------------------------------------------------


James Earl Carter, Jr
 
(Jimmy Carter
) 
39th 
 PresidentDemocrat 
Term of Office: Jan uary 20, 1977 to Jan uary 20, 1981


Question:   Which Political Party decided to start giving Annuity payments to immigrants? 
  
AND MY FAVORITE:   

ANSWER:  
That's right!  JAMES EARL CARTER, JR.  (JIMMY CARTER)  (DEMOCRAT, TERM OF OFFICE:  JANUARY 20, 1977 TO JANUARY 20, 1981 AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY.        
IMMIGRANTS MOVED INTO THIS COUNTRY, AND AT AGE 65, BEGAN TO RECEIVE SOCIAL SECURITY PAYMENTS:   THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY GAVE THESE PAYMENTS TO THEM, EVEN THOUGH THEY NEVER PAID A DIME INTO IT!
          


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away! 
    
And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! 

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of Awareness will be planted and maybe changes WILL evolve! ..   Maybe not, some 
Democrats are awfully sure of what isn't so.  But it's worth a try.  How many people can YOU send this to?   
Actions speak louder than bumper stickers.  
AND CONGRESS GIVES THE MS ELVES 
100% RETIREMENT FOR ONLY SERVING ONE TERM!!! 
 


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Thomas Jefferson 
3rd.
 President, Democrat 
Term of Office: Jan uary 20, 1777 to Jan uary 20, 1781


"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have".   
                                  Thomas Jefferson

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Am So NOT In

 

I AM SO NOT IN.....

I have noted that many elected officials, both Democrats and Republicans, called upon America to unite behind Obama.

Well, I want to make it clear to all who will listen that I AM NOT uniting behind Obama!

I will respect the Office, which he holds, and I will acknowledge his abilities as an orator and wordsmith (read LIAR) and pray for him, BUT that is it.

I have begun today to see what I can do to make sure that He is a one-term President!

Why am I doing this?

It is because:

§ I do not share Obama's vision or Value system for America ;

§ I do not share his Abortion beliefs;

§ I do not share his radical Marxist's concept of re-distributing wealth;

§ I do not share his stated views on raising taxes on those who make $150,000 and the ceiling has been changed three times since August;

§ I do not share his view that America is arrogant;

§ I do not share his view that America is not a Christian Nation;

§ I do not share his view that the military should be reduced by 25%;

§ I do not share his view of amnesty and giving more to illegals than American Citizens who need help;

§ I do not share his views on homosexuality and his definition of marriage;

  § I do not share his views that Radical Islam is our friend and Israel is our enemy who should give up any land;

§ I do not share his spiritual beliefs (at least the ones he has made public);

§ I do not share his beliefs on how to re-work the health care system in America ;

§ I do not share his strategic views of the Middle East, and certainly do not share his plan to sit down with terrorist regimes such as Iran.

§ I do not share his view that law-abiding citizens should be denied the right to own and use firearms in any lawful way they see fit!

Bottom line, my America is vastly different from Obama's, and I have a higher obligation to my Country and my God to do what is right!

For eight (8) years, the Liberals in our Society, led by numerous entertainers who would have no platform and no real credibility but for their celebrity status, have attacked President Bush, his family, and his spiritual beliefs!

The shameful way his campaign attacked Sarah Palin during the recent election. (And her family);

They have not moved toward the center in their beliefs and their philosophies, and they never came together nor compromised their personal beliefs for the betterment of our Country! They have portrayed my America as a land where everything is tolerated except being intolerant!

They have been a vocal and irreverent minority for years; they have mocked and attacked the very core values so important to the founding and growth of our Country!

They have made every effort to remove the name of God or Jesus Christ from our Society! They have challenged capital punishment, the right to bear firearms, and the most basic principles of our criminal code; they have attacked one of the most fundamental of all Freedoms, the right of free speech!

Unite behind Obama? Never!

I am sure many of you who read this think that I am going overboard, but I refuse to retreat one more inch in favor of those whom I believe are the embodiment of Evil!

PRESIDENT BUSH made mistakes during his Presidency, and I am not sure how history will judge him.

However, I believe that he weighed his decisions in light of the long established Judeo-Christian principles of our Founding Fathers!!!

Majority rules in America, and I will honor the concept; however, I will fight with all of my power to be a voice in opposition to Obama and "his goals for America."

I am going to be a thorn in the side of those who, if left unchecked, will destroy our Country!! Any more compromise is more defeat!

I pray that the results of this election will wake up many who have sat on the sidelines and allowed the Socialist-Marxist anti-God crowd to slowly change so much of what has been good in America !

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Congress's Retirement Benefit vs Your Social Security Benefit

Social Security 2009

LET US SHOW OUR LEADERS IN WASHINGTON "PEOPLE POWER" AND THE POWER OF THE INTERNET. PLEASE FORWARD TO ALL OF YOUR FRIENDS

IT DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU ARE REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT! 

Propose this in 2009: 

START A BILL TO PLACE ALL POLITICIANS ON SOCIAL SECURITY 
  ---------------------------------- 
SOCIAL SECURITY: 


Perhaps we are asking the wrong questions during election years.. 

Our Senators and Congresswomen
 do not pay into Social Security and, of course, they do not collect from it. 
You see, Social Security benefits were not suitable for 
persons of their rare elevation in society. They felt they should have a special plan for themselves. So, many years ago they voted in their own benefit plan. 

In more recent years, no congressperson has felt the need to change it. After all, it is a great plan. 

For all practical purposes their plan works like this:


When they retire, they continue to draw the same pay until they die. 
Except it may increase from time to time for cost of living adjustments... 

For example, Senator Byrd and Congressman White and their wives may expect to draw $7, 800,000.00 (that's Seven Million, Eight-Hundred Thousand Dollars), with their wives drawing $275, 000..00 during the last years of their lives. 
This is calculated on an average life span for each of those two Dignitaries.
 

Younger Dignitaries
 who retire at an early age, will receive much more during the rest of their lives. 

Their cost for this excellent plan is
 $0.00. NADA!!! ZILCH!!! 

This little perk they voted for themselves is free to them.
 You and I pick up the tab for this plan. The funds for this fine retirement plan come directly from the General Funds; 

"OUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK"! 

From our own Social Security Plan, which you and I pay (or have paid) into, every payday until we retire (which amount is matched by
 our employer), We can expect to get an average of 
$1,000 per month after retirement. 

Or, in other words, we would have to collect our average of $1,000 monthly benefits for 68 years and one (1) month to equal Senator Bill Bradley's benefits! 

Social Security could be very good if only one small change were made. 

That change would be to 

Jerk the Golden Fleece Retirement Plan from under the Senators and Congressmen.. Put them into the Social Security plan with the rest of us 

Then sit back..... 

And see how fast they would fix it! 

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe good changes will evolve.
 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Incompetents Are at It Again

I guess I must be on the wrong page… 

A vehicle getting 15 mpg and 12,000 miles per year uses 800 gallons a 
year of gasoline. 

A vehicle getting 25 mpg and 12,000 miles per year uses 480 gallons a 
year. 

 So, the average Clunker transaction will reduce US gasoline consumption 
by 320 gallons per year 

They claim 700,000 vehicles – so that's 224 million gallons per year. 

That equates to saving a bit over 5 million barrels of oil per year. I 
repeat---per YEAR. 

5 million barrels of oil is about ¼ of one day's US consumption. 

And, 5 million barrels of oil costs about $350 million dollars at $75/bbl. 

Our Government "gave" each Clunker Trader $4,500 per car for 700,000 
transactions which cost US Taxpayers $3,150,000,000--not including Washington's astounding 
Administrative costs. 

So, we all contributed through our taxes to spend more than $3 billion to 
save $350 million. 

How good a deal was that ??? 

They'll probably do a great job with health care though. NOT 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I'm Reading Atlas Shrugged

How did Ayn Rand know?  She classified the troop in D.C. many years ago.  Now, any time I read any thing about our government, local, state, or national, I think:
 
What are the Liars, Looters and Moochers up to today?  I think it has a nice ring to it.  Or, if you're into acronyms, the L2M's.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another Blood Sucking Entity that does nothing

Does anybody out there have any memory of the reason given for the establishment of the DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ..... during the Carter Administration?   
  • Anybody?   
  • Anything?
  • No?  
Bottom line .. we've spent several hundred billion  dollars in support of an agency .. the reason for which not one person who reads this can remember.
Ready???????   
It was very simple.. and at the time everybody thought it very appropriate...
The 'Department of Energy' was instituted on
   8- 04-1977


TO LESSEN  OUR
DEPENDENCE ON
FOREIGN OIL
.

Hey, pretty efficient, huh?????


AND NOW IT'S 2009,
32 YEARS LATER ...
AND THE BUDGET
FOR THIS


NECESSARY DEPARTMENT
IS AT $24.2 + BILLION
A YEAR

      
IT HAS
16,000 FEDERAL EMPLOYEES
AND APPROXIMATELY
100,000 CONTRACT EMPLOYEES
AND LOOK AT THE JOB IT HAS DONE!

THIS IS WHERE YOU SLAP YOUR FOREHEAD AND SAY
'WHAT WAS I THINKING?'  
Ah, yes, good ole bureaucracy..

And NOW we are going to turn the Banking System, health care & the Auto Industry over to them?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Joe Legal vs. Jose Illegal


Here is an example of why hiring illegal aliens is not economically productive for the State of California, or anywhere else in our nation...

You have 2 families..."Joe Legal" and "Jose Illegal". Both families have 2 parents, 2 children and live in California.

"Joe Legal" works in construction, has a Social Security Number, and makes $25.00 per hour with payroll taxes deducted.....

"Jose Illegal" also works in construction, has "NO" Social Security Number, and gets paid $15.00 per hour cash "under the table".

Joe Legal...$25.00 per hour x 40 hours $1000.00 per week, or $52,000 per year.
Now take 30% away for state & federal tax.

Joe Legal now has $31,231.00

Jose Illegal...$15.00 per hour x 40 hours $600.00 per week,  or $31,200.00 per year.
Jose Illegal pays no taxes...
Jose Illegal now has $31,200.00.

  Joe Legal pays Medical and Dental Insurance with limited coverage $1000.00 per month or $12,000.00 per year.
Joe Legal now has $19,231.00

Jose Illegal has full Medical and Dental coverage through the state and local clinics at a cost of $0.00 per year.
Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00

  Joe Legal makes too much money and is not eligible for Food Stamps or welfare.
Joe Legal pays for food $1,000.00 per month or $12,000.00 per year.
Joe Legal now has $ 7,231.00

Jose Illegal has no documented income and is eligible for Food Stamps and Welfare.
Jose Illegal still has $31,200.00

Joe Legal pays rent of $1,000.00 per month, or $12,000.00 per year.
Joe Legal is now in the hole...
minus (-) $4,769.00

Jose Illegal receives a $500 per month Federal rent subsidy.
Jose Illegal pays rent $500.00 per month unsubsidized, or $6,000.00 per year.
Jose Illegal still has
$25,200.00

Joe Legal now works overtime on Saturdays or gets a part time job after work to cover his bills, like a good and responsible American does.

Jose Illegal has nights and weekends off to enjoy with his family.

Joe Legal's and Jose Illegal's children both attend the same school. 

Joe Legal pays for his children's lunches while Jose Illegal's children get a government sponsored lunch.

  Jose Illegal's children have an after school ESL program.

Joe Legal's children go home.

Joe Legal and Jose Illegal both enjoy the same Police and Fire Services, but Joe paid for them and Jose did not pay.

Do you get it now?  It's not a matter of being "nice" to illegals, they are LAW BREAKERS!

The above situation is REAL and IS supported by the very politicians who are at this moment running this country into bankruptcy!

Don't vote/support any politician that supports illegal aliens...

It's PAST time to take a stand for America and Americans (the REAL ones; even if they are "new")!
 

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cap and Trade Passes House

I listened last night as the votes came in, down to the wire, passing the Waxman Markey Cap and Trade bill.  The Liars and Looters in Congress passed it by 7 votes I believe.
 
If this abomination makes it thru the Senate and to the Great Prevaricator's desk for signature, it should hence forth be known as the:
 
Foreign Oil Workers and Foreign Manufacturing Full Employment Act.
 
Or if you like a more crass title, Screw Americans Act.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Washington the Distric of Corruption

Washington DC the logic free zone, started out as a swamp and turned into a sewer

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Random Thoughts on Energy Policy

You want energy independence, build nuclear power plants and drive electric cars and trucks

=======================================================================================================

If I owned energy company and oil company, I would cut off supplies to all environmentalists. No power, no fuel. They want to us the live that way, they can start right now.

Then we can see how may environmentalists it takes to make a gallon of bio-fuel.
==========================================================================
The real definition fo the green policy, steal the green out of your wallet and put it in the governemnt's pocket.

=============================================================================

After a quarter-century of gas tax hikes, a ban on drilling for oil and a complete destruction of the nuclear power industry in America, I guess liberals can declare: Mission accomplished.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Punishing Employers Hiring Illegals

Your response to my "negative" on punishing employers hiring illegals i.e. "sorry" drives this response "sorry you don't get the big picture" do you.

As for punishing employers for hiring illegals, give me a break.

It's the governments job to make sure that illegals don't get into this country to start with, period.

As an employer, it is my expectation that people coming thru my front door for jobs are here legally, GOT IT. It is NOT MY JOB to do the government's job and figure out whether the person who came in applying for a job is legal or not.

To punish an employer who is hiring in good faith because the GOVERNMENT is sucking at their job is criminal. Punish the incompetent elected officials and government bureaucrats first, then we can talk about employers.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345678910Next »